With War Review, Signs of Progress and Decline in Afghanistan

The White House has completed its formal review of the war in
Afghanistan and of the U.S. strategy there. Though the review expresses
deep skepticism about the progress of the war, it affirms President
Obama’s plan to begin reducing troops levels in July 2011 and to bring
the majority of U.S. troops home by 2014. Analyzing the state of play in
Afghanistan has always been difficult, but this report comes amid an
unusually mixed series of reports from the country, which alternatively
show promising steps forward as well as discouraging signs of
disintegration. Here’s what reporters, analysts, and pundits are seeing
in today’s war.

summary said the United States continues to kill leaders of Al Qaeda
and diminish its capacity to launch terrorist attacks from the region.
It cited some signs that the United States and its allies have halted or
reversed inroads by the Taliban in Afghanistan and strengthened the
ability of Afghan forces to secure their country, but acknowledged that
the gains are fragile and could be easily undone unless more progress is
made towards hunting down insurgents operating from havens in
neighboring Pakistan.

  • No Long-Term Success Unless Pakistan Comes Around  “New
    U.S. intelligence reports paint a bleak picture of the security
    conditions in Afghanistan and say the war cannot be won unless Pakistan
    roots out militants on its side of the border, according to several U.S.
    officials who have been briefed on the findings,” reports
    the Associated Press a few days ago. “It
    says the war cannot be won unless Pakistan is willing to obliterate
    terrorist safe havens in its lawless tribal areas bordering Afghanistan.”
  • Serious Setbacks in Once-Peaceful North  Joshua Foust had earlier warned in The Atlantic that this would happen. The New York Times’ Alissa Rubin now adds that, “although
    the numbers of American and German troops in the north have more than
    doubled since last year, insecurity has spread, the Taliban are
    expanding their reach, and armed groups that purportedly support the
    government are terrorizing local people and hampering aid organizations.”
  • Signs of Progress in Taliban’s Home City  The New York Times’ Carlotta Gall sees a promising increase
    in security in Kandahar, Afghanistan’s former capital and the largest
    city in the Taliban-dominated south of Afghanistan. In The L.A. Times, Peter Mansoor and Max Boot say we’re doing better than you might think across the crucial southern districts:

a recent 10-day visit at [Petraeus'] invitation, we found a classic,
and successful, counterinsurgency campaign being conducted in the south.
We drove around Kandahar city and saw markets flourishing. Children who
once threw stones at American vehicles now wave at our soldiers. As we
went north into the Arghandab River Valley–a Taliban stronghold until a
few months ago–we found numerous American and Afghan outposts and
soldiers patrolling on foot between them.

  • 5 Ways to Do Better  Andrew Exum lists them in Foreign Policy. Click through to read his explanations, which include (1) “Cut Funding for the War,” (2) “Compromise on Combat Enablers,” (3) “Reinvent, Don’t Replace, the Special Envoy,” (4) “Find
    and Pressure Dual Citizens,” and (5) “Go Long.”

Posted in: Latest News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

United Post

Aspen Blog Posts

Latest Comments

Latest Blogs

This site copyright © 2010 Post Time Media. All Rights Reserved.